I LOVE THIS AD ABOUT HOW FAST TECH CHANGES!

Read More

MOVIES: "TREE OF LIFE"

Terrence Malick’s “Tree of Life” is unlike any other movie you’ve ever seen. In a good way. A very good way. If you’ve seen the transcendent, intriguing trailer, you probably thinking: “I hope the movie is as good.” Well it’s very in keeping with the trailer and way better than it. “Tree of Life” is simply one of the most extraordinary films ever made. Or maybe you were thinking: “I still don’t know what it’s about!” You’re in for a rare, rare treat. A film of this stratospheric caliber comes along every, oh, twenty years or so. Malick has broken some kind of film barrier. He has found away to substantially un-limit, un-fetter, and set film free.

[By the way, “Tree of Life” is a perfect Father’s Day film.]

Terrence Malick portrays a family of three boys (the story is narrated by the eldest, Jack, played with preternatural talent by newcomer Hunter McCracken) growing up in the 1950’s with a so-many-people-can-relate-to stern father (Brad Pitt), and a sweet, loving mother (Jessica Chastain). I wouldn’t call her submissive, because she is very aware of her husband’s harshness, and keeps what peace there is by not crossing him more, and makes up for his hardness with her softness.

Dad is not a monster, however. There are many loving moments with the boys and we can understand where the Dad is coming from. But nevertheless, his sons are still watching and listening to his shortcomings, small and large. Brad Pitt is just spot-on as this flawed father who claims to be loving his sons while often still putting himself, his own ambitions and fragile self-image first.

One smallish gripe with the movie is that the mother almost borders on the girlish, the “idealized feminine,” and she never seems to be terribly busy. But of course, perhaps this is how young Jack saw her, things did move at a slower pace in those days, and perhaps even Moms had more leisure time, or perhaps the point WAS to focus on her playfulness in contrast to Dad.

When I say the eldest boy “narrates”—it’s not your typical voiceover. There are whispered prayers to God. God is “You,” or sometimes that “you” might be interchangeable with a family member. Snatches of daydreams and wishes. We hear his mother’s internal dialogue as well, and once in a while his Dad’s. Fox Searchlight has described the movie as “impressionistic,” and it is, but it’s also more solid than that. Although told in a beyond-brilliant kaleidoscope of small scenes, the story is very strong and unmistakable. These small scenes are so lifelike, so filled with the constant motion of childhood and boyhood and real life, you just give up trying to figure out how Malick did it, how he planned it, how he shot it, how he pieced it all together.

How does God speak? Oh, through everything. He busts out all over, permeates everything, and is as silent as planetary movement. He is known by Jack first through the people of faith who raised him: thanking God with grace at meals, worship at church, courage in tragedy, pointing to the sky “where God lives.” And young Jack struggles to know God, to find reasons to be a good man. The older Jack (Sean Penn) has an adult faith, but keeps going back to his young self to pick up the threads. But his faith is not fragile. It’s beautiful. It’s awakening and blossoming always fuller like God’s revelation of Himself. God who swims with His strangest red creatures in the bluest oceans and belches forth orange and black fire and smoke from a lava pit.

There is an extended (and I do mean extended) sequence of nature scenery intended either to make us gape in wonder, realize that (our) size doesn’t determine our preciousness, or imbibe God through our senses. Or all three.

There are NO gadgets in this movie. None. No phones (wait—there was just one toward the beginning), no TVs, no radios. People are unmediated. People just sit and wait. People look at each other. People read each others’ faces. People talk to each other, but most communication is non-verbal. The eyes have it. People stare. People touch each other. We witness the long thoughts of childhood. These are the days when we did ONE THING AT A TIME.

This is an incredible THEOLOGY OF THE BODY movie. It is the primal, primordial Theology of the Body movie. The masculine and feminine principles are so clearly delineated, and one of the film’s taglines seems to be: “O father, O mother, forever you wrestle within me.” Of course, the principles are witnessed and told from a male perspective (both the writer/director and main character are males). We see that we need both in our lives, in our heads, in our hearts. But it seems like Jack is really trying to understand his mother more than anything. Her pure love. Her telling him that the purpose of life is love and nothing else. His mother seems to be his muse.

"The woman is at the heart of the home. Let us pray that we women realize the reason for our existence: to love and be loved and through this love become instruments of peace in the world."
-- Blessed Mother Teresa

My own Moms totally understood this. If we WOMEN harden our hearts—what will happen to this old world? My Moms used to say over and over: “This earth could be heaven if we’d just love one another.”

After seeing the trailer and hearing the words: “There are two ways: the way of nature and the way of grace. We must choose which way we will follow,” I was concerned. It seemed to be setting up that horrible false dichotomy. Grace BUILDS on nature! These two things are not mutually opposed at all. But what was really meant was “nature without grace,” because the narration goes on to say: “Nature tries to please itself, be noticed, etc., while grace is humble, doesn’t need recognition….” It almost seems like Dad represented nature while Mom represented grace. It’s almost like St. Paul’s “flesh warring against the spirit,” idea—which does NOT mean the body/matter is bad or lowly! It means that there ARE parts of us that are not conformed to God, to God’s way of being and doing things.

Creation is screaming at us. God is screaming at us. Terrence Malick is screaming at us by making God scream at us through Nature/Creation. Terrence isn’t so much shoving God down our throats as he’s shoving God-in-Nature/Creation down our throats. Nature/Creation is a HUGE piece of THEOLOGY OF THE BODY, one that, IMHO, has not yet been developed by TOB scholars and us TOB soapbox vigilantes.

(Vadim Perelman [“House of Sand and Fog,” “The Life Before Her Eyes”] makes SUBTLE use of nature in his movies, also to marvelous ends.)

And yet, and yet, as @conversiondiary (atheist turned Catholic Mommy blogger) says: “God is just so ignorable.” If we have even an inkling to do so, we can shut Him out for our entire lives.

The soundtrack rumbles and church bells toll and operas rage. Nothing is ordinary. We look and look again. The universe is one big cathedral.

“Father,” “Mother,” “Brother” is whispered over and over (no sisters here)—the only “things” that matter. The mother “gives” her son to his wife. Relationships are all that matter, so we can bury our childish trinkets in the backyard before we move on.

Where is God? Well, He’d like to ask you the same question: Job 38:4. (The film begins with this verse.)

OTHER STUFF:

--This film will do a lot for people’s faith in God and/or sense of the metaphysical. It will strengthen them and give them permission to give in to their spiritual ruminations. Especially men. The film illustrates the concept that women just “get it,” while men have to “learn it.”

--As a Dad and lover of kids himself, Brad Pitt is just the perfect choice for the part.

--It was mostly the secular press/media (methinks) at my screening. They kinda sat in awe at the end. Or befuddlement. Time will tell. BUT I kinda think they liked it. Like the secular press/media liked “Into Great Silence,” and “Of Gods and Men.” In fact, I think they appreciate these movies MORE than us churchy people who breathe this God atmosphere all the time and probably take the Most High for granted as much as we try not to.

--Great lines said to God: “You let anything happen.” “Why should I be good if You’re not?”

--"Tree of Life" is about the predominant influence of our families on us. You will not be able to watch this movie without totally reminiscing about your own childhood.

--My posterior was well aware that “Tree” was 138 minutes. This is one long meditation, or as Roger Ebert calls it: "a prayer." You may wish to prepare with push-ups or other blood-circulating activities. Notwithstanding the fact that I was out of sorts, starving, uncomfortable, squished, and in desperate need of a lavatory while screening this film, I absolutely loved it, cannot shake it and don’t want to, and will be singing its praises for years to come.

--The WOWFACTOR and under-your-skin INDELIBILITY of this movie will DOUSE any NAYSAYING.

--Malick externalizes the internal, exteriorizes the interior like no other director.

--God is seeping….

--For further reflection, meditate on the words of one of my fav hymns: “Immortal, Invisible, One Only God” (can be sung in a bombastic OR lightly prancing fashion).

--Golda Meir once said: “Don’t be so humble, you’re not that great.” This movie seems to say: “Don’t be so great, you’re not that humble.”

--Can you say "explicit religious imagery that makes you want to be spiritual AND religious?"

--You will hear the cry of Our Lady of Sorrows: “My son!”

--If I’m not mistaken, the narration at the beginning says: “The nuns always told us….” Was that just wishful hearing????

--Dinosaurs!!!

--The nature cinematography emphasizes both the micro- and macro-level, and sometimes you can’t tell which is which and you can’t tell what the heck you’re looking at (some of ‘em even look like cancer spores) but it doesn’t matter because “everything is beautiful in its own way” and we are going to have aeons to live and appreciate everything.

--Job may be one of the oldest books of the Bible.

--Job didn’t have Jesus.

--Job didn’t have Jesus, so how the helicopter could he understand suffering?

--Malick has Job and Jesus.

--This most unusual of movies appropriately ends with the sound of wood thrushes, the most beautiful birdsong this side of the Promised Land.

PSALM 50
[1] The Mighty One, God the LORD,
speaks and summons the earth
from the rising of the sun to its setting.
[2] Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty,
God shines forth.
[3] Our God comes, he does not keep silence,
before him is a devouring fire,
round about him a mighty tempest.
[4] He calls to the heavens above
and to the earth, that he may judge his people:
[5] "Gather to me my faithful ones,
who made a covenant with me by sacrifice!"
[6] The heavens declare his righteousness,
for God himself is judge! [Selah]
[7] "Hear, O my people, and I will speak,
O Israel, I will testify against you.
I am God, your God.
[8] I do not reprove you for your sacrifices;
your burnt offerings are continually before me.
[9] I will accept no bull from your house,
nor he-goat from your folds.
[10] For every beast of the forest is mine,
the cattle on a thousand hills.
[11] I know all the birds of the air,
and all that moves in the field is mine.
[12] "If I were hungry, I would not tell you;
for the world and all that is in it is mine.
[13] Do I eat the flesh of bulls,
or drink the blood of goats?
[14] Offer to God a sacrifice of thanksgiving,
and pay your vows to the Most High;
[15] and call upon me in the day of trouble;
I will deliver you, and you shall glorify me."
[16] But to the wicked God says:
"What right have you to recite my statutes,
or take my covenant on your lips?
[17] For you hate discipline,
and you cast my words behind you.
[18] If you see a thief, you are a friend of his;
and you keep company with adulterers.
[19] "You give your mouth free rein for evil,
and your tongue frames deceit.
[20] You sit and speak against your brother;
you slander your own mother's son.
[21] These things you have done and I have been silent;
you thought that I was one like yourself.
But now I rebuke you, and lay the charge before you.
[22] "Mark this, then, you who never think of God,
lest I rend, and there be none to deliver!
[23] He who brings thanksgiving as his sacrifice honors me;
to him who orders his way aright
I will show the salvation of God!"

SINCE I WAS EMBARGOED FROM PUBLISHING THIS REVIEW TILL NOW—I COULDN’T STOP MYSELF FROM TWEETING ABOUT “TREE OF LIFE”:

"Tree of Life" is a grateful celebration of life!about 5 hours ago via web

"Tree of Life" is like a living, filmic scrapbook of one person's life....about 5 hours ago via web

We go to heaven together: “Tree of Life”

"Tree of Life"--the cream rises to the top. http://t.co/pbVieFK4:15 PM May 22nd via web

"Tree of Life"--From boo-ing to top prize (Palme d'Or) at Cannes!!!http://t.co/pbVieFK

Feel need to reconnect with self, past, God, nature, family, people? http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife

2011 is the Year of the God Film: "Soul Surfer," "Tree of Life," "Courageous." 11:16 PM May 18th via web

Great review of "Tree of Life" Chicago Tribune's Michael Phillips http://t.co/5ykt1DD


We don't need to fantasize TOO much cuz our reality really is fantastical. http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
20 minutes ago

"Cave of Forgotten Dreams" and "Tree of Life": art, images, and memories.
20 minutes ago

"Tree of Life": wicked awesome.
21 minutes ago

"Tree of Life": you'll never be the same.
21 minutes ago

What are some of the ways humans "know"? See "Cave of Forgotten Dreams" and "Tree of Life." Just remember: "Cave" and "Tree."
22 minutes ago

"Tree of Life" has changed filmmaking forever.
22 minutes ago

"Tree of Life" will knock your socks off.
7 hours ago

Get your Godflow on: http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife

@ebertchicago Roger Ebert VIA SrHelenaBurns
"Tree of Life" is a form of prayer. My new blog entry, just posted:http://bit.ly/iMWLTr
23 hours ago

Film is evolving.... http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
17 May

This film has made me very, very happy. http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLif

Got God? http://Foxsearchlight.com/TreeofLife

Another awesome and accurate review of "Tree of Life" (Variety Mag) variety.com/review/VE11179…

"Tree of Life" was booed AND cheered at Cannes! Oooooooh, controversial!!
"Tree of Life" got booed at Cannes. Now you HAVE to go see it. http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Why we need Moms AND Dads: http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Why we need Dads AND Moms: http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

How do you "get back" to God? http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

It's not your imagination. God really is talking to you. All the time. http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Looking for a Theology of the Body movie? http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

There is no body/soul split in http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Can you tell I like this movie? http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Ladies--wondering how men relate to God? http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Magnifique: Brad Pitt in http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Job 38:4 http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Indescribable. http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Is God looking for you? http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

Looking for God? http://FoxSearchlight.com/TreeofLife
1 hour ago

"Tree of Life" is a big, fat unabashed God movie.
3 hours ago


The perfect Father's Day movie:http://FoxSearchlight.com/TheTreeofLife
6 hours ago

Our earthly fathers weren't perfect, but our heavenly Father is.
http://FoxSearchlight.com/TheTreeofLife

Read More

"TREE OF LIFE"--ONE OF THE MOST EXTRAORDINARY FILMS EVER MADE

JUST WON TOP PRIZE AT CANNES (THE PALME D'OR)!!!

Read More

THE PROBLEM WITH SECRET ALGORITHMS!

THE INTERNET, GOOGLE, YAHOONEWS, FACEBOOK ARE ALL TAILORING WHAT YOU SEE TO WHAT THEY THINK YOU WANT TO SEE! THERE'S NO MENTION OF TWITTERFEED WHICH I THINK SIMPLY SHOWS YOU POSTS IN REAL TIME OF WHOMEVER YOU FOLLOW?

Read More

HERE'S HOW IT'S DONE....

www.pauline.org

Read More

MOVIES: "CAVE OF FORGOTTEN DREAMS"

“Cave of Forgotten Dreams” is the latest documentary by the inimitable Werner Herzog (“Rescue Dawn,” “Grizzly Man”). Herzog is both a fiction/feature film writer/director AND documentary maker. Audiences tend to either like him or not. I’m a liker.

And you have to like HIM to like his films, because he will earnestly and tersely narrate the whole thing to you in his non-lilting, non-professional-voiceover German accent, as if you’ve been cornered at a dinner party of terribly interesting people. You can feel him straining for insight and understanding—often stretching out a story line—but I don’t mind because he does manage to find those nuggets of truth, and he leaves spaces for you to find your own.

To me, Herzog is one of the most human of all filmmakers, inserting himself and everyone else into his documentaries in the most casual and unpolished of styles. He films himself filming. He films his cameramen filming. We hear him asking questions of his interviewees, and then he interrupts them to probe further. He tells one of his interviewees about to go off and demonstrate something: No, stay here. But Herzog is not a Bill Maher-type control freak over his productions. It’s more what BJP2G would call the “personalistic norm.” That is, everything we do, we do humanly. Everything we do is personal and partly subjective: perspective, participation, appreciation, influencing outcomes, etc. And the personalistic norm is a good thing. Humans should humanize. Persons should personalize. Herzog needs to involve everyone and everyone-experiencing-everything in his doc as part of a successful experiment.

Herzog is always after “humanness,” and will baldly go after that question time and again in his work. In a recent interview on NPR he spoke of how, growing up in Germany after the War, he was often very hungry as a child. He eschews graphic violence in films and won’t allow it in his own (“comic book” violence—KAPOWEE!—is OK, though). I remember in “Grizzly Man”—the story of Grizzly Bear enthusiast Timothy Treadwell and his death at the hands of a Grizzly—Herzog came into the possession of a video recording of the actual event. Treadwell’s girlfriend was filming the encounter until it turned deadly. She dropped the videocam while it continued recording the audio, and tried to save Treadwell. She was also killed. On camera in “Grizzly Man,” Herzog gives the original recording to a previous girlfriend of Treadwell’s and tells her to destroy it. He did not include the gruesome audio in his documentary.

“Cave of Forgotten Dreams” takes us into the Chauvet Caves in Southern France where, in 1994, the oldest cave drawings in the world, 32,000 years old—in pristine condition—were discovered. They are twice as old as any other cave drawings ever found. Herzog, entering the caves with a team of scientists and art historians is the only person ever allowed to film the extraordinary sight. And now WE get to ogle the exquisite and refined line drawings of animals (some also shaded in) of (mostly) a single, very talented artist. There are very strict rules and limitations for entry into the caves, including sterile boots and a vault door that locks behind you. The lights and cameras that Herzog and crew were allowed to bring in were not of the highest quality, but in the end, the effect is that we see the joyous and wondrous drawings in the same kind of flickering, dancing light that the Paleolithic people first to enjoy them saw them in: torch light.

There is only one image of a human being: a woman—but she is combined with an image of a bull. This is the only fantastical creature portrayed. The rest of the beasts are straight-forward but artistic renderings of the plethora of animals that surrounded these early modern humans (many of the species now extinct): woolly mammoths, woolly rhinos, hyenas, wolves, horses, bears, lions, ibex. There are even large butterflies and insects. Oh, but the horses are so beautiful. Everyone in the film pretty much agrees that they are the crown jewel of the caves. The depictions are mostly profiles, but there are exceptions. A bison turns his head to look over his shoulder at us (or at a pride of lions).

Why all animals and no people? Perhaps the centrality and primacy of animals to the lives of the people. They were the daily occupation, the hunted. Yet they were not only prey for the humans but predators. They were food, they were the source of all kinds of life-sustaining resources. Perhaps, like the Native Americans, they were seen as spirits from which humans could imbibe many qualities.

The soundtrack is slightly discordant modern chorale singing and/or strings. I couldn’t help thinking that--as we silently reflected on the hordes of horses undulating across the smooth, curved, contoured walls of the cave--we were listening to HORSEhair bows dragging across the violin and cello(?) strings….

Herzog wants to involve ALL our senses. He even brings in a master perfumer to use his nose for us in the caves (doesn’t really work). At one point, Herzog makes everyone be SILENT and just listen to the silence and dripping in the caves.

I’m not really sure why Herzog calls this a cave of “dreams.” Herzog is obviously fascinated by every person he interviews, and asks them about their personal lives as well. At one point he uncovers that one of the archaeologists had been a circus performer. After seeing the cave drawings for the first time, this archaeologist began dreaming about them at night. He called dreaming: “A way to understand things that is not direct.” Perhaps this is where Herzog took the title of his film. And certainly these drawings were “forgotten”! Imagine the artist knowing that we—his brothers and sisters from the future—are admiring his work all over the world on large screens! Of course, he does know, because “to Him all are alive” (Luke 20:38).

OTHER STUFF:

--I’m one of those people who normally can’t see 3-D, even with the glasses, but this was in “Real D 3-D” (whatever that means) and it worked!

--I loved the eccentric German dude dressed in an Ice Age fur parka who played “The Star-Spangled Banner” on an ancient flute made from a vulture radius. Yeah. Herzog is that quirky. But he’s not out to make us laugh. He REVERENCES quirky.

--I really, really, really want to see the horses on a T-SHIRT.

--“Hippies” are named thus after “Hippos” which is Greek for horse. The horse symbolizes “truth-seeker.” Pope Paul VI was purported to have said that horses are the most beautiful animals God ever made. If he did, I concur.

--Herzog believes in and wants to put “ecstatic truth” in his films. He wants to go for “emotional accuracy” above all. I believe he has achieved it in “Cave.”

--A virtual cave has been created by laser scanners. One portion of the cave is called “Sacre Coeur.” :]

--Question asked in the film: “Was Stone Age man a romanticist?”

--The ancient artist(s) solved a question paleontologists had: extinct male “cave lions” didn’t have manes!

--Sometimes the artist created several outlines of the same animal or gave it extra legs to denote motion! Looks almost like a cartoon or zoetrope at times, especially with the flickering light! Herzog also filmed REAL fade-ins and fade-outs with the muted lights they were allowed to use in the cave!

--If you love this NATGEO type stuff, you’ll love “Cave.” There’s just too many cool factoids to mention here.

--Neanderthals didn’t do art.

--The 20 or so pairs of older people in my theater were the stillest movie-goers EVER. Even during the previews. They didn’t eat, talk, cough, laugh, move—nothing. I have never experienced such a thing. They made me feel positively hyperactive. Did they feel that viewing this extraordinary gallery was a privileged, sacred experience?

--Herzog’s ending was bizarre and anti-climactic: albino alligators, doppelgangers, “nothing is certain, nothing is real”—SAY WHAT???

--Werner Herzog on the Chauvet Caves: “It’s as if the modern human soul burst forth here.”

Read More

MOVIES: "FINDING FATIMA"

Great new DVD from the makers of "The 13th Day"! "Finding Fatima" is shot in the same Bresson-esque and super-stylized way as "The 13th Day." While hearkening to and honoring filmmaking's past, the Brothers Higgins are simultaneously bringing the story and message of Fatima to a new generation.

As much as I love watching documentaries, I was just going to give this a quick perusal, but I got hooked and couldn't stop watching.
I thought I knew a lot about Fatima--it's my favorite Marian apparation, and I've been reading books and watching films about Fatima since I was a teenager--but I learned a ton from "Finding Fatima." "Finding Fatima" could be called "Fatima Then and Now," because it brings us up to speed on the Fatima story as it continues to unfold in our present day.

The Higgins Brothers use clips from their "13th Day" for the re-enactments, as we get to know the personalities of the three visionary children in depth. This documentary is chock-full of fascinating, down-to-earth interviews and historical footage, all presented in a spritely way. There's not a dull moment in this life- and joy-filled documentary, even with its more sombre sepia-toned visual edges! Innovative without being novel or gimmicky, "Finding Fatima" has a 21st-century feel to it.

One thing that "Finding Fatima" brings out that--surprisingly--often gets lost in the shuffle of the more sensational miracles/wars/secrets aspects of Fatima is the fact that Mary's visits were also intended to spread devotion to her Immaculate Heart. Mary stated that Jesus wanted to triumph through her Immaculate Heart. She even showed her heart, encircled with thorns to the children at one point.

The pacing is perfect, the interview clips are kept short and the interviewees even sort of "dialogue" with each other! The soundtrack is as mottled as the bordering-on-dreamy palette of colors the film is shot in. Perhaps Ian and Dominic Higgins are onto something new: "transcendent filmmaking." Although all filmmaking should have the quality of the transcendent,* what if your film really is about the real Queen of heaven and earth? "Finding Fatima" is a template of how you might wanna proceed.

Subtitles also in SPANISH.
___
*"Art must make perceptible, and as far as possible attractive, the world of the spirit, of the invisible, of God. It must therefore translate into meaningful terms that which is in itself ineffable. Art has a unique capacity to take one or other facet of the message and translate it into colors, shapes and sounds which nourish the intuition of those who look or listen. It does so without emptying the message itself of its transcendent value and its aura of mystery."
--Blessed John Paul II the Great, #12 "Letter to Artists"

Read More